Problem Specification

Let's revisit the pipe flow example considered in the previous exercise.
As before, the inlet velocity is 1 m/s, the fluid exhausts into the ambient
atmosphere and density is 1 kg/m3. For µ = 2
x 10-5 kg/(ms), the Reynolds no. based on the pipe diameter
and average velocity at the inlet is
At this Reynolds number, the flow is usually completely turbulent.
A turbulent flow exhibits small-scale fluctuations in time. It is usually
not possible to resolve these fluctuations in a CFD calculation. So the
flow variables such as velocity, pressure, etc. are time-averaged. Unfortunately,
the time-averaged governing equations are not closed i.e. they contain
fluctuating quantities which need to be modeled using a turbulence model.
No turbulence model is currently available that is valid for all types
of flows and so it is necessary to choose and fine-tune a model for particular
classes of flows. In this exercise, you'll be turned loose on variants
of the k-ε model. But in the real world, tread with great
caution: you should evaluate the validity of your calculations
using a turbulence model very carefully (which, ahem, means that there
is no getting away from studying fluid dynamics concepts and numerical
methods very carefully). FLUENT should not be used as a black
box. The k-ε models consist of two differential equations:
one each for the turbulent kinetic energy k and turbulent dissipation ε.
These two equations have to be solved along with the time-averaged continuity,
momentum and energy equations. So turbulent flow calculations are much
more difficult and time-consuming than laminar flow calculations. This
is an exercise to whet your appetite for turbulent flow calculations.
Go to Step 1: Create Geometry in GAMBIT
|